|
|
| |
|
ARE THESE WORKSHOPS REALLY FOR YOU? FIND OUT WITH THIS QUICK
QUIZ.
Answer "Yes" or "No" to the following descriptions of the research climate at your school.
|
Ten Common Proposal Pifalls; or, Why Too Many Good Ideas are
Rejected on First Reading
|
|
|
- There is increasing pressure from the governing board and upper administration
to increase external funding
- Sponsored research activity is lower than it should be because too few faculty are submitting
proposals
- Proposals with good ideas are being turned dowwn because they aren't well written
- Faculty
who don't write proposals say they don't see any real advantages in sponsored research
- Junior faculty say they are
too busy with teaching and publishing to spend time writing grants
- Many faculty believe that grant writing is a low
probability game and not a good use of time
- Faculty in some departments complain that there is too little grant money
available in their disciplines
- Many faculty are unaware of opportunities to collaborate with other researchers
- Faculty
don't seem to know how to find good funding oportunities in their discipline
- Faculty whose proposals have been
declined say they've learned their lesson--they won't try again
|
|
|
- POOR FIT: Proposal doesn't match the sponsor's program objectives
- WEAK ARGUMENT: Proposal doesn't present
a compelling case that the project should be funded
- LOOSE ORGANIZATION: The presentation is hard to follow; document
isn't clearly organized into distinct sections
- GYRATING JARGON: Language is too dense, filled with insider phrases
and acronyms
- MURKY OBJECTIVES: Proposal lacks clear statements of project goals and specific objectives
- VAGUE
WORK PLAN: Project activities and timelines are not clearly spelled out
- FAILURE TO FOLLOW DIRECTIONS: Important application
guidelines are not strictly followed
- REVIEW CRITERIA IGNORED: Writing does not specifically address sponsor's evaluation
standards
- WEAK ABSTRACT: Project summary does not adequately represent the full scope and importance of the project
- LACK
OF PROOFREADING: Proposal hastily submitted, contains inconsistencies, typos and other errors
|
|
|
If you answered "Yes" to one or more of these statements,
then these workshops will definitely benefit your institution! And, you have an opportunity to provide a helpful, low cost
growth experience that your faculty will greatly appreciate. Consider: If these workshops result in just one more successful
grant, the return on investment can be impressive.
|

|
|
|